2.09.2011

Film

 

 

Yakima

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well after spending 50 dollars on a camera, 25 on film and processing, and several hours taking only 48 shots I’ve decided that film is not for me.

4 comments:

  1. Hahaha! My grandpa just sent me his old Canon. I'm guessing I'll come to the same conclusion, but I gotta try.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh that's too bad... I had a great first experience in the darkroom last month. From my 20 exposures of legos I made a contact sheet and one enlargement.

    It did take a ...long... while.

    ReplyDelete
  3. a long while is relative...yours is an instant generation, this is not a criticism just an observation. Anticipation and patience, is what is really developed in a darkroom. Are these traits out-dated?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hmmmmm . . . maybe not out of date, but perhaps differently used????

    I have a pictures which required hours of hiking to get. I have left the shutter open for half the night getting getting star trails, I've chased a lone butterfly halfway up Moscow Mountain while trying to get close enough to get a clear shot. The process of digital photography is so different from that of film, the way I frame and compose my shots, dialing down f-stops and playing with exposure times - all of this is done blindly when I shoot with film. No longer can I shoot and see, and learn from that shot. No longer can I explore with my camera. I can not test and test and retest. I cannot discover a angle, I cannot find a new light. I have 24 shots. I have 3 rolls. I cannot discover anything new during a shoot. I can only document. It's a very different way of capturing images. When you can take countless shots, when you can learn as you go, when you can see the effect your changes make - well it's just very different.

    ReplyDelete